Another Reason Texas is Superior to New Mexico
You know, there was a time a couple of years ago when I didn't know a single New Mexican that had a paying job. Mind you, back then I only knew my buddy Holmes's common law wife, one of her friends, and I met some chick in an airport bar in Phoenix. Granted, the chick in the airport bar in Phoenix was a housewife and yadda yadda yadda so she certainly had a job. But not a paying one. Look, I had a worldview to feed!
What's my point? I didn't have one, other than New Mexicans are suspect. And if you insist on not clicking the link to the article, then reading said article, here's the first line of it: "(Santa Fe-AP) – The House has approved a measure that would require ignition interlocks on every vehicle sold in New Mexico." Not knowing anything about New Mexico's legislative arrangement, I'm assuming it's bicameral.
I'm also assuming (remember that worldview!) that the House plays burned Phish CD's all day long, or maybe some bluegrass. Assuming also that they conduct their debates under clouds of heavy aromatic smoke, and instead the sound of a gavel banging, action in that legislative body is punctuated by the telltale burble of a bong hit.
This thing's laughable. A sign of MADD gone mad. "The measure’s sponsor, Grants Democrat Ken Martinez, says it would save lives." That cudgel again. But Rupe, you say, if it saves Just One Life, wouldn't... No. Stop that line of thought. If we're going to work under those conditions, here's the cost of a human life: The liberty lost to keep that life in service.
Am I saying blowing into a little device before you can start your car is too onerous a task to reasonably expect people to perform? Nope. What do I care? The kind of nanny-staters that would consider this a viable chunk of policy don't care because of that One Life we were talking about. They're not worried about cost in dollars so they're certainly not concerned about, let's face it, a herculean inconvenience.
But that few hundred/few thousand dollars per car for these devices might be better suited to other keeping-people-alive tasks. Maybe the cost of 50 of these devices, including retrofits and redesigns, could pay for a state trooper for a year. And there are the trickle-down economic effects--these what-ifs are always fun. I'm sure there are a couple of manufacturers that would simply write off the already-worthless NM market. I hear there are a couple of states close by that wouldn't have stupid breathalyzer requirements for their cars. Let's see, there's saintly Texas, Colorado I think, Arizona, Utah. All full of car dealerships with comparatively inexpensive cars that don't take an few seconds to start up, assuming you (or the kids riding with you) get a good read on that first blow. Ouch... that one hurts.
Bye, Lots of NM Car Dealerships. Good thing they're all owned by rich people! Of course, by the time all this comes around the state will be subsidizing all the devices anyway (Look, you know it's true...) so there will be less money to actually spend on those out-of-state cars.
So let's hope that state Senate rolls its collective eyes, puts the bong down, and uses this bill in the bottom of the Senate Birdcage.
